Archive for October, 2007
Thursday, October 25th, 2007
A discussion list (Theology and Worship) in the Uniting Church is currently discussing cafe worship style. Here’s 12 pointers I posted today. I’m aware that the recommendations here fly in the face of what is accepted as theologically acceptable worship. But my contention is that much of our preciousness about order of worship is based not on theology but on setting.
1. Visit popular cafes to explore best practice ambience.
2. Communal singing works best when people are standing close enough to each other to hear other voices. It doesn’t work well when people are sitting around tables or at a bar (or scattered around a church building for that matter). For that reason I’ve preferred to either drop the singing or make it a time when we get together around the piano like a choir. Communal singing means more when people have had a shared experience - and so I prefer to schedule it at the end rather than the beginning.
3. Up front teaching without dialogue works best in lecture theatre settings. So what works best in the cafe or restaurant setting? Eating, conversation, casual reading.
4. People come and go in cafes and restaurants, not all at the same time. So I’ve allowed a good 15 to 30 minutes at the beginning to allow for the development of conversation, the enjoyment of food and drink. Likewise - I like to allow the same kind of time at the end.
5. After we’re warmed up we might then introduce a fresh conversation starter - whether that be a Nooma DVD, a music video clip, a drama or dramatic reading of Scripture, a real-life story interview or a clip from a movie.
6. Look around the well established cafe and you’ll find newspapers and magazines, maybe wireless internet access, table activities for kids, and perhaps arty advertising postcards. I’ve put the Sunday newspaper on the tables to allow for introversion time as well as conversation starters later. In some cases we’ve put newsprint (butchers paper) on the tables with felt pens and invited people to doodle. Or we’ve put out activity sheets.
7. In some cases we’ve invited each table to contribute to the worship by preparing a prayer or dramatic Bible reading.
8. In one setting we divided into interest groups part way through - the craft group, the prayer group, the deep and meaningful discussion group, the music group, the kick a ball around outside group.
9. Clarify the contract. People usually expect ‘church’ to fit certain criteria - starting and finishing time, teaching from the front, singing at the start etc. So right at the beginning - for those who are gathered ready to go, I’ve learnt to explain how the next 60 to 90 minutes will proceed and why.
10. Consider meeting outside the usual church environment. The typical church building (even if it has movable chairs) elicits expectations of what church is like. Meeting in a hall, cafe, restaurant or bar frees that up.
11. Get some decent food and drink. It doesn’t have to be coffee. Quality juices, herbal teas, soft drinks, water, along with nibbles make all the difference.
12. Consider meeting less often. Doing cafe church can be a bit draining on the financial and time budget.
Posted in Uniting Church, Worship | No Comments »
Monday, October 22nd, 2007
The front page of the Courier Mail (Brisbane) this morning began with a classic typo. “The wormed turned on John Howard last night as Opposition Leader Kevin Rudd outshone the Prime Minister in the one and only debate of the campaign.”
I listened to the first half an hour of the debate on ABC Radio, without the benefit of a worm. I arrived home to see the rest of the debate on Channel Nine.
It was surprising to see the audience response to Howard and Rudd as they spoke. I think I agree with Tony Abbott’s assertion that most of the audience had already made up their mind and were reflecting their personal response to the two contenders rather than engaging with what they had to say.
There were exceptions. Howard’s assertion that George Bush was changing his mind on climate change sent the worm to the pit. Howard saying that George Bush was wrong and Turnbull was right on climate change sent him up again. Rudd got a solid response to his claim that Bush was not open to discussing global warming. His alternative vision of reconciliation sent the viewers’ responses soaring. Rudd talked briefly about saying sorry as a matter of respect that could make it possible to get on with the task of working together for positive solutions.
It would be interesting to see the two prospective treasurers in debate. Peter Costello clearly would have liked to have been up front last night. The wormed would be treated to a different perspective on taxes and IR reform perhaps.
Posted in Australia, Politics, Reconciliation | No Comments »
Saturday, October 13th, 2007
John Howard has opened a new door with his policy announcement on reconciliation. Howard on Thursday evening told the Australian nation that he was ready to lead the next phase of Australia’s move through reconciliation, calling for a national referendum on the formal recognition of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders as the indigenous people of Australia.
See The Right Time - Constitutional Recognition for Indigenous Australians online at the Liberal Party’s News page
John Howard introduces the move by referring to the recent legislation surrounding intervention in Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory.
“This intervention – and in particular the public’s reaction to it – has been a watershed in Indigenous affairs in Australia. It has overturned 30 years of attitudes and thinking on Indigenous policy. The response from people around Australia has again highlighted to me the anguish so many Australians feel about the state of Indigenous Australia and the deep yearning in the national psyche for a more positive and unifying approach to Reconciliation.”
OK John. The intervention brought the federal government back from thirty years of leaving reconciliation in the too hard basket.
“This new Reconciliation I’m talking about starts from the premise that individual rights and national sovereignty prevail over group rights. That group rights are, and ought to be, subordinate to both the citizenship rights of the individual and the sovereignty of the nation. This is Reconciliation based on a new paradigm of positive affirmation, of unified Australian citizenship, and of balance – a balance of rights and responsibilities; a balance of practical and symbolic progress. It is this balance which holds the key to unlocking overwhelming support among the Australian people for meaningful Reconciliation.”
Individual rights and national sovereignty are concepts at the heart of the colonialism that has got us where we are today. It was the ignorance of group rights that led to the belief that the continent of Australia was unclaimed and open to ownership by the British. If there is to be any sense of balance, then individual rights, national sovereignty and group rights need to kept in tension. That of course will require governments with great skills of diplomacy, patience and discernment.
“I have never felt comfortable with the dominant paradigm for Indigenous policy – one based on the shame and guilt of non-indigenous Australians, on a repudiation of the Australia I grew up in, on a rights agenda that led ultimately and inexorably towards welfare dependency and on a philosophy of separateness rather than shared destiny. This nation spent (and wasted) a lot of time in the last 30 years toying with the idea of a treaty implying that in some way we are dealing with two separate nations. To me, this goal was always fundamentally flawed and something I could never support. We are not a federation of tribes. We are one great tribe; one Australia. I still believe that a collective national apology for past injustice fails to provide the necessary basis to move forward. Just as the responsibility agenda is gaining ground it would, I believe, only reinforce a culture of victimhood and take us backwards.”
Saying sorry is not about shame John. Collective responsibility for a nation’s past does not need to begin or end with embarrassment and disgrace. Apology paves the way for recognition of hurt, the giving and acceptance of forgiveness, and the shared will to work together for a better future.
Nations are almost always federations of tribes. Throughout the world attempts to ignore that fact have resulted in either the denigration of particular cultures or the disintegration of inter-tribal trust. Unity comes not from uniformity, but from reconciled diversity.
In his interview with the press, recorded on his Prime Minister’s web site, John says that he has no intention of saying sorry for the treatment of Aboriginal peoples, citing that the majority of middle Australia would not support it. A responsible government would take some responsibility for the education of citizens in their shared responsibilities for nationhood, including responsibilities for reconciliation. The present government is pouring millions of dollars into educating citizens about their responsibilities for the environment, stewardship of electricity and water, and internet safety. How about pouring millions of dollars into helping Australian citizens share responsibility for reconciliation?
Getup! Australia is responding to John Howard’s announcements by calling for the next parliament and PM say ’sorry’ as their very first act on the very first day. See the campaign page: The First Act Is Saying Sorry.
“Australia’s parliament holds a key to this new way forward - symbolically and practically. An apology is not about guilt or shame or individual responsibility - it is the embodiment of the spirit of reconciliation, and the springboard for a nation committed to stamp out the systemic ills that still flow from a nation unable to address its past wrongs. After over two hundred years of dispossession and ten years of despair, we must use this startling pre-election conversion to push for so much more: a commitment to close the health gap; Australia’s signing of the UN Declaration on Indigenous Peoples; a consulted and empowered Indigenous community enjoying the rights and privileges of a first-world country - not just a non-binding amendment to the Constitution’s preamble.”
Join high profile leaders on Indigenous issues in the Getup! blog, giving their opinion on John Howard’s startling pre-election conversion and plan to amend the Constitution’s preamble.
Posted in Australia, Politics, Reconciliation | 2 Comments »
